"Success has many fathers while failure is an orphan". I remember this saying when people talk about the success of IT industry in Bangalore. SMK played a very vital role in the progress of Karnataka. It is a truth and no one can dispute it. There were other factors too helped this growth, but SMK's role is great.

So many netas want to claim responsibility for all good things happened in Bangalore and at the same trying hard to blame SMK for the traffic and pollution.

SMK is a great leader. I support him.

Jayalakshmi

SM Krishna did not do anything path breaking. Just because he is US educated ans speaks good English is no reason to call him the best CM.  Quite frankly, apart from a growing number of Coffee Days (run by his Son in Law), I didn't see much growth he should be proud of.  Look at Chandra Babu Naidu, who actually reduced low level corruption in AP & then attracted huge investments to the wretched city of Hyderabad.  If Naidu was Karnataka's CM, he would have been thrice as successful.

Thanks to loads of average engineers from private colleges, great weather & warm and friendly Kannadigas, Bangalore rose to its prominance...Krishna had no role....